Euthanasia Legalization

euthanasia Legalization By Renee Rosenkilde Rosenkilde 1 Although the unify States, and the rest of the land, have made astounding inventions and break through with(predicate)s in technology, health care is still subject to criticism. Even in the twenty- initial century, there are numerous supplantpoint, inveterate, and liveness thr burying diseases circling the world. Because of these circumstances, when a patient is diagnosed with a painful disease that lead defeat them in a forgetful amount of time, they should be allowed to decide how they want to end their life time lag for the disease to knock down them, or instantly receiving assisted self-destruction and death their pain immediately.Through the process of expeditious mercy killing, a person diagnosed with a terminus distemper can immediately die. Active euthanasia would allow a person with a end point illness to be administered a deadly medication which will instantly kill them and release them from their t orment. An other retrace water of assisted suicide, passive euthanasia, is eliminating every medical examination assistance in retentiveness a patient alive, until their death.Active euthanasia should be legalized because it is legal according to the constitution, it is a less expensive alternative, certain religions partake in the act of restless euthanasia, and overall it will allow a conclusionly ill and misfortunate patient to end their distress. Active euthanasia should be legalized throughout the fall in States because it is legal according to the war paint. Currently, assisted suicide is only legal in the states of Washington, Oregon, and Montana (ND NA wrtl. org).Active euthanasia would allow a citizen of the unify States a painless death, and an allotted time to label goodbye to their friends and family members. Once respond is given(p) from both the patient themselves, or the family, fighting(a) Rosenkilde 2 euthanasia should be a possibility for or soone with a store chronic illness. Steven Ertlet comments, The bereaved family and friends of cancer patients who died by euthanasia coped better with respect to affliction symptoms and post-traumatic stress reactions than the bereaved of comparable cancer patients who died a natural death. (ND Ertlet divide 1). Whereas passive euthanasia would contribute to an extensive amount of pain and suffering, active euthanasia would allow for an immediate, accessible, and painless death. The Constitution of the get together States says, certain untransferable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. whenever each form of government becomes hurtful of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it. The United States Constitution grants its citizens the right to pursue happiness, which in some shimmys whitethorn be through active euthanasia.The Constitution restates this idea in a more precise form in the Due Process Clause first sectio n of the 14th amendment No state shall make or enforce any legality which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States nor shall any state deprive any person ofliberty, or property, without due process of law nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. The Constitution states that if it is a persons desire to die through active euthanasia, it shall be provided to them through to the Due Process Law first section of the fourteenth amendment.In the case that active euthanasia would be the best option for a United States citizen struggling with a terminal illness, active euthanasia should be considered. Euthanasia should be legalized in the United States, because it would allow for a citizen with a terminal illness a quick and painless death as well(p) as abide to the Unites States Constitution. Rosenkilde 3 With the declining economy in the United States, saving(a) silver and cutting unnecessary outlay is of gr eat importance.With health spending accounting for over 17% GDP how much a aim produces in some amount of time in the United States, it is the highest in the world (NA ND data. wordlbank. org). Cutting this percentage as much as practicable would drastically improve the Untied States economy. The cash spend in hospitals is employ to cure patients with different illnesses. Although this is thoughtful on the Statess part, in firearmy cases it is unnecessary. If a patient is diagnosed with an incurable terminal illness, there is not much point in wasting money to keep them suffering for as long as possible.Mpoziemski, an online debater at euthanasia. procon. org comments, Is it not more compassionate to end a humans suffering then(prenominal) to make them hold on only to die later later on a long, drawn out pain filled battle? (Mpoziemski 2012 divide 1). Keeping a patient suffering until they die of natural causes is mistaken when it is possible through active euthanasia to end their suffering as soon as possible. As an added note, this would also help save money throughout this country in drastic numbers. Once approval is given for active euthanasia to be administered, it is can easily save the patient and the hospital money.Certain cancer treatments can be as costly as $10,000, which is added to the accumulating bill for doctor visits, lab tests, room charges, imaging tests, radiation treatments, drugs and other medicines, nurse care, surgery, and homecare (NA ND cancer. org/treatment). Prolonging the life of a patient with an illness is costly for both the hospital and the patient. Instead of paying money to suffer for a longer amount of time, a person with a terminal illness can receive active euthanasia and avoid both the carnal and financial pain.Rosenkilde 4 The United States was originally a British small town which British citizens fled to for religious freedom. America seemed as a place where everybody could freely practice their religion . Therefore, when the United States liberated themself from Great Britain, the basis of this country was base rack up of the freedom of religion. The first amendment of the United States Constitution says Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thus (www. archieves. ov amendment 1). According toreligions. pewform. org, Judaism, a religion that over 2% of all American adults practice, accepts the idea of suicide in certain circumstances. A story in the Torah tells of a young man who was told by God to commit suicide in order to end his suffering. The story tells of a young man who was being burned alive by the Romans, and god tells him to end his suffering by breathing in large amount of smoke and flames to kill him more quickly. Also, Jewish people do not associate suicide as murder.Although the Torah explains breaking one of the Ten Commandments thou shalt not kill as a sin, suicide does not abide by this commandment, and therefore is not considered a sin. Another main religion in the United States is Hindooism. Practiced mainly by Americans of Indian decent, this religion has ancient suicidal practices. One example of this is called suttee. This is a ritual practice throughout India in which a wife will commit suicide after her married mans death so that he would have a partner in the afterlife. suttee the Indian custom of a widow burning herself, either on the funeral pyre of her dead husband or in some other fashion, soon after his death. (http//www. britannica. com/EBchecked/topic/575795/suttee). Another example of Hindoo suicide is the practice of prayopavesa. Prayopavesa is when a Hindu will fast (not eat food) until their death. This practice is used under certain circumstances only for the conscientiously advanced. Rosenkilde 5 Prayopavesa is only used when a person has an incurable terminal illness. Not consuming any food or water will eventually kill the person, most likely faste r than the illness would have.The Hindu religion believes in the concept of karma good or bad hatful generated by your actions. Some Hindus believe that a person who helps other end a painful life and thereby reduce suffering is doing a good deed and will gain good karma. (http//www. religionfacts. com/euthanasia/hinduism. htm). In all, the United States was based off of freedom of religion, and this concept has been encoded in the first amendment of the constitution. Therefore, if a religion accepts and enforces the practice of assisted suicide (active euthanasia), then it should be legalized throughout the United States.Although active euthanasia is a politically and sacredly controversial topic, research can conclude that euthanasia should be legalized crosswise the United States. Due to the fact that the United States Constitution accepts the use of euthanasia, it cannot be ruled as illegal. As well, the United States Constitution, and the entire country, was based off of the freedom of religion. Therefore, if certain major religions accept, and encourage the use of active euthanasia, than the medical procedure should be legalized across the nation so that these religious practices may take place in a safe medical environment.As well, active euthanasia should be legalized because it can save a great chew of money across the United States. With over 17% of GDP used on hospitals and the medical world, taking a person out of their misery would be more effective and less costly. The costs for doctor visits, lab tests, room charges, imaging tests, radiation treatments, drugs and other medicines, nurse care, surgery, and homecare accumulate to progressively high bills for both the patient and the hospital. Finally, and most importantly, the practice of active euthanasia can quickly, easily, and effectively take a patient with a terminal Rosenkilde 6 llness out of their pain and misery with an allotted time to say goodbye to their loved ones. With a patient dying due to a disease anyways, wouldnt it make more sense to end their life quickly and easily instead of keeping them alive to endure a life of pain? Active euthanasia should be legalized throughout the United States, and should be made an option for anyone with a miserable, chronic, long-term, terminal illness. Works Cited http//www. lifenews. com/2003/07/20/bio-21/ http//www. wrtl. org/assistedsuicide/assistedsuicide/whereitislegalus. aspx http//www. law. cornell. edu/constitution/amendmentxiv ttp//www. fed-soc. org/publications/detail/whether-there-is-a-constitutional-right-to-die http//www. ushistory. org/declaration/document/ http//euthanasia. procon. org/view. answers. php? questionID=000207 http//www. cancer. org/treatment/findingandpayingfortreatment/managinginsuranceissues/the-cost-of-cancer-treatment http//data. worldbank. org/indicator/SH. XPD. TOTL. ZS http//www. religionfacts. com/euthanasia/hinduism. htm http//www. archives. gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_trans cript. html http//www. britannica. com/EBchecked/topic/575795/suttee http//religions. pewforum. org/reports