An Analysis Of Democracy In The UK

An Analysis Of Democracy In The UK conscionable how re commonan is Britain? I give examine the most important aspects of the British society, from semipolitical to ethnical. The focus of the turn out is to understand whether a commonwealth rattling works in sp ar some(prenominal)place the citizens of the unify Kingdom. In rule to do this, I will use line of productss for and against several elements that contri ande to the land of a society and produce a plausible conclusion as to whether this is currently exercised in the Great Britain. The essay will be divided into three sections in an effort to make points more simplistic. Those parts atomic number 18 political, juristic, and ethnic. Each part will then be broken raft into pipelines for and against the general question.Questions to readWhat is democracy?Can democracy be delimit?What eventors make up a elected society?Is the term for the people, by the people true?Does the first knightly the post pl acement exertion the wishes of the citizens?How can the idea of democracy damage a country?Should Britain generate a written constitution?Is in that respect a real legal separation of bureau in the join Kingdom?Should the government enforce laws that foil religious beliefs in a democracy?Can Britain be exposit as a democratic society?Detailed Outline divide 1 excogitationIntroduction Democracy is a word unremarkably use to describe the British political system. Words such as baredom, equality and terms such as people rule are often reiterated as the principle elements that make a society democratic. From the rattling inception of the word the term democracy in ancient Hellenic times, the basis has remained unkempt and precise over thousands of years majority rule. However, over the past five decades, this nonpareil very clear view of democracy has been blurred or any(prenominal)what misconceived in Britain, leading to a justify war between the people and the state .Topic Sentence Democracy is a word commonly used to describe the British political system.dissertation statement Although, it whitethorn be perceived that the United Kingdom boasts one of the strongest democracies in the world, there are m either factors whether legal, political or cultural that are very undemocratic. financial turn out source(s) Copp, Hampton and Roemer, 1993 Inoguchi, Newman and Keane, 1998 split 2Introduction of political aspectTopic judgment of conviction The political system currently universeness exercised in the United Kingdom is one that is often praised and immortalized. separate 3First argumentation in favour of political aspects The general cosmos is responsible for choosing who represents them.Topic sentence The main basis of democracy is protected in Britain citizens partake in free and lovely elections which on the wholeow them to contract those who they want to govern them.Supporting source(s) Wheeler, 2009Paragraph 4Counter-argument agains t the first argument The public selects the h entirely of Commons, not the put up of Lords who exercise the same amount of money of power if not more in Britain.Topic sentence A concerning factor present in the slope political arena is the elitist House of Lords and their selection.Supporting source(s) Cole, 2006 Wheeler, 2009Paragraph 5 foster argument in favour of political aspects The first past the poll system of voting allows for free and fair voting.Topic sentence One of the many democratic aspects the British claim is the first past the post system.Supporting source(s) Lijphart, 2008Paragraph 6Counter-argument against second argument in favour of politically democratic aspects of British society First past the post system is democratic in theory but not in reality.Topic sentence heretofore though the first past the post system is seen as interpreter of the society wishes, there are several discrepancies in this system which would font an uneven representation of the gen eral public.Supporting source(s) Cole, 2006 Wheeler, 2009Paragraph 7Introduction of the legal aspectTopic sentence Apart the political implications, there are several legal factors that make many question whether these policies are truly in place to benefit society.Supporting source(s) To be tack togetherParagraph 8First argument in favour of legal aspects Written constitutionTopic sentence The absence of a written constitution from the English ratified System has always been seen as good to the British society.Supporting source(s) Bogdanor, Khaitan and Vogenauer, 2007Paragraph 9Counter-argument against first argument in favour of legal aspects Unwritten constitutions give the state to constantly reposition anything that could affect the well being of the society.Topic sentence Even though self-generated constitutions are flexible, it places a tremendous amount of power in the state hands.Supporting source(s) Bogdanor, Khaitan and Vogenauer, 2007, Wheeler, 2009Paragraph 10Secon d argument in favour of the law Separation of powersTopic sentence The separation of power is a very important part of the English Legal system, which is express to be very democratic.Supporting source(s) Epstein, 1994Paragraph 11Counter-argument against the second argument in favour of the law Separation of powers is merely a case volume doctrine.Topic sentence As with many other doctrines in the English Legal System, the separation of powers may work in theory but not in reality.Supporting source(s) Epstein, 1994Paragraph 12Introduction of cultural aspectTopic sentence Perhaps, one of the most important aspects of a democratic society is the cultural aspect which embodies religion to freedom of speech.Paragraph 13First argument in favour of cultural aspects Britain embraces all religionsTopic sentence Britain is said to be one of the most multicultural nations in current Europe embracing several types of races and religions.Supporting source(s) Lijphart, 2005Paragraph 14Counter argument against first argument in favour of cultural aspects There is no separation of the church from the state.Topic sentence The British society claims to embrace all religions but there is sedate no separation of the church from the state.Supporting source(s) Cole, 2006Paragraph 15Second argument in favour of culture The state enforces any undeniable structures to protect the country.Topic sentence Another necessity to a democratic society is the aegis of its citizens.Supporting source(s) Crossman, 2007Paragraph 16Counter-argument against the second argument in favour of culture The accountability to protect is not the right to violateTopic sentence It is imminent that the lives of those inhabiting a country should be aptly protected by the state but covert invasion is not in any form or fashion democratic.Supporting source(s) Crossman, 2007Paragraph 17A discussion examining both sides of whether Britain can be considered a democratic nation.Topic sentence There is comp etent induction to show that there are several issues that signify Britains lack of democratic practices. It is also clear that the views and rights of the general public are often ignored. However, imputable to societys ignorance or lack of inte shack concerning this, much cannot be done to save the situation.Supporting source(s) Cole, 2006 Copp, Hampton and Roemer, 1993 Inoguchi, Newman Keane, 1998Paragraph 18 ConclusionRestatement of the thesis statement In conclusion, even though the United Kingdom prides itself as being one of the most democratic nations in the world, the recent actions of the state and the constant invasion of the citizens rights could lead one to question how democratic the British society really is.Summary of main points of the essay Political voting system Legal written constitution, separation of powers Cultural religion, privacy.Concluding remarks The United Kingdom may be considered a democracy on paper but in reality several of their policies are u ndemocratic.Annotated BibliographyBooksReference Cole, M. (2006) Democracy in Britain. Edinburgh University sign upColes (2006) fifth chapter in his critically acclaimed academic book, Democracy in Britain is aimed at the critique of the British democratic system. Cole is aiming for a reading sense of hearing of those interested in politics and possibly international relations and uses streetwise and germane(predicate) training to help prove his arguments. In this chapter, Cole focuses on the oppose layers of a system which is regularly praised. He uses the downfalls of the British political system such as the voting system, the House of Lords and pluralism to tolerate his arguments. Although the rest of the book focuses on the positive aspects of British democracy, this chapter encompasses a critical overview of the negative side with the use of evidence to support his arguments. This chapter will be of concomitant use in my third, sixth, 4teenth and seventeenth paragraphs respectively, to show that the first past the post voting system has failed as a democratic entity, the House of Lords is unjustified and that the doctrine of pluralism may be a part of supposititious Britain but it is not practiced.Reference Copp, D., Hampton, J. Roemer, J. E. (1993) The Idea of Democracy. New York Cambridge University Press.Copp, Hampton and Roemers (1993) book is aimed at the political science arena and uses relevant information to cover every area of democracy ranging from its origin to its future. The informants discuss the stability of democracy and reception a number of fundamental questions that needed urgent assessment in the wake of new democratic regimes surfacing in the 21st Century. The book spawns a collection of essays from various prominent contributors in the political, legal and philosophical realms. The authors use several arguments and thoughts in an effort to give a equilibrate critique of democracy. This book and the diverse opinions in it will help in the introduction and conclusion of my essay.Reference Inoguchi, T., Newman, E. Keane, J. (1998). The Changing Nature of Democracy. New York United Nations University Press.Inoguchi, Newman and Keanes (1998) introductory phrase to their book The Changing Nature of Democracy is a credible collection of work edited by the authors. Inoguchi and Keane, both political science professors and Keane, an international relations lecturer, aim their book at political science students. As the name suggests, the book analyzes the changes that democracy has seen in the fit 40 years. The book is a collection of essays from renowned political professors who all acknowledged the presence of democracy in every aspect of modern day society. It introduces several definitions of the term democracy then goes onto dissecting into segments ranging from social factors to worldwide forces using a number of democratic nations from around the world to solidify points. This book is critical a nd informative and shows that democracy is a changing constitution and will continue to change according to society. The authors pay special care to presenting neutral articles and cope both sides. This book will be used in the introduction and discussion segment of the essay.Reference Lijphart, A. (2008) Thinking more or less Democracy. New York Routledge.Lijpharts (2008) book is a collection of work that is current and sufficient and is particularly aimed at avid political science researchers. Thinking about democracy covers several areas of democracy, tracing the process of its development over the stand up 40 years. The main theme is European democracy but the author uses India and South Africa to purport some of the points rose. The regular dimensions of democracy are explored such as majoritarian election system and reform. Lijphart, an influential political scientist uses analytical and pedantic authorship to argue many fundamental points in his book. This book will be helpful proving that the first post the post system is fair and that the British is actually a pluralist society.JournalsReference Epstein, L. (1994) Changing perceptions of the British system Political Science Quarterly. Volume 109, No. 3 Special divulge 1994, pp. 483-512.Epstein (1994), a scholar in the political sphere, uses his article published in the Political Science Quarterly to present a report on parliamentary democracy in Britain. The ideas in the article are relevant and logical and give a clear indication of it point to the readers. bit the article serves as a comparison between the American and British systems, it implicates several points about constitutional reform, election methods, separation of powers and the House of Lords. some(prenominal) of the problems facing the British system are compared to the American system. Epstein uses the British democratic system to devise whether the Americans should follow their policies, highlighting benefits and consequences of the British system. Apart from the fact that the article was compiled in 1994, many of the facts are still prevalent in the 21st Century. I will be using this article to support and refute the issue of separation of powers in Britain.Reference Bogdanor, V., Khaitan, T., Vogenauer, S. (2007). Should Britain exhaust a written constitution? The Political Quarterly, Vol. 78, No. 4, October-December 2007Bogdanor, Khaitan and Vogenauers (2007) article is aimed at any one having an interest n political science and offers up-to-date information about the topic being argued. The British have always had an unwritten constitution and the government seemed to be thriving under this regime. However, many enquire if recent changes in society can still allow for societies to experience without codified rules that govern their nation. The approach of some is to leave the constitution as it is while some believe it is time to show that Britain has these rules. Comparisons to other nations th at have written constitution such as the United States of America are made. Even though the authors may appear bias in their findings, it was a credible and supported article that gave sufficient evidence from both sides. This daybook will be used in the legal segment of my essay to argue for and against the constitutional issue in Britain.WebsitesReference Crossman, G. (2007) Overlooked care and personal privacy in Modern Britain. Online Available at http//www.liberty-human-rights-org.uk/issues/3-privacy/pdfs/ liberty-privacy-report.pdf Accessed 15 Feb 10Crossmans (2007) report is a credible and informative piece aimed at anyone who in interested in public policies. The author, Gareth Crossman, is an activist who petitions on behalf the Liberty foundation, a website that enables and fights for human rights. The report examines privacy in the United Kingdom and the economic consumption the state and the media should play in imposing on the lives of other. Different aspects of pri vacy are examined in the introductory parts of the essay but Sections three, four and eight are of particular interest to my argument. Findings indicate that the media is more abandoned to expose those in the public eye rather than the general public and the state has the right to put initiatives in place to protect the country. At the same time, it is recommended that both the media and government use their powers without invading on the lives of ingenuous people and find a wave length that clearly shows it is for protection purposes. The report examines the entire privacy argument and uses analytical writing to argue both for and against the issue. This report will help to argue the points in the cultural aspect of the essay concerning privacy and show that although the government may consider itself justified in its actions, that this must be done while charge the reasonable man in mind.Reference Wheeler, B. (2009) Time for a Westminster transformation? BBC News. Online Avail able at http//newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk /1/hi/uk_politics/8060896.stm?ad=1 Accessed 15 Feb 10Wheeler (2009), a political reporter for BBC News aims this article at the general public particularly those interested in British politics and uses current and reliable information to argue his views. The article covers the democratic system in Britain and whether it may be in need of some rehabilitation in the near future. It highlights a number of changes that are being sought to replace the old system of democracy. There is an analysis of both sides of the argument, showing those that believe strongly in reformation and those who believe reformation will weaken the system rather than strengthen it. The author uses his expertness and argumentative writing to assess both sides of the argument. Although he made his opinion on the matter clear he avoided the use of biased writing and produced a very critical, coherent text. This article will be utile in the p olitical aspect of the question and will help to support and refute some of my arguments about the voting system in the United Kingdom.