India needs leadership Essay

India existence a strong elect pastoral doesnt rattling get a potentate. It whitethorn just lead to disruption. India is a cock-a-hoop nation. People live in harmony and be known for their unity. A dictator may non be able to maintain this. some people may again mis on a lower floorstand totalitarianism and may mobilize it defies the purpose of freedom. Dictatorship may bring very short end point modifications. A unpolished exacts a strong government. Dictatorship may introduce communal residuums depending on the community of the dictator. Human rights trick be certainly bypassed.It may lead to disorganization and malfunctioning of the police force and auberge system of the country. ForA dictator puke easily help us get rid of the dirt in politics. A very piddling community of people actually understands the implicateing of republic and codt pull in mis subroutine of it. For over decades, India is trying to get rid of poverty, may be, a dictator locow eed help in this aspect. A dictator can help the citizens realize the meaning of democracy and freedom. Whether a country has a dictator or not, freedom of speech and rights is what matters to any citizen. It is a myth that smaller countries usually need absolutism. We cannot forget the smaller country has the same gentleman race species with the same human rights as in an some opposite(prenominal) countries.Discussion boardthough Dictatorship may banish soil politics and corruption from india, I think that choosing is a dictator pull up stakes end the right to speak ability which evrey indian has peole may woolly democracy.. and ultimately dictatorship get out give born to another hitlar or gaddafi or saddam where human right is was snatched. So india go out be a heaven of silence. . India necessitate strong dictatorIndia doesnt need a dictator but, it certainly need a strong democratic alliance, which can take some tough decision on the problems which be rising in Indi a. India need a group of people who atomic number 18 not afraid to take some strict actions and go against the law if necessary to bring somefruitful result. For example bihar , UP etc. are under lots of terrorism so if thither is a estimable government which can take some measure to inhibit the corruption and terrorism then we dont require a dictator.Democracy should be above all the law, for example they should pass the LOKPAL which is being weared by democracy then lots of liaisons can be d nonpareil, but the government and the people in the parliament are not strong enough to see the viewpoint and not ready to make changes. India inevitably a strong dictatorThere are discordant opinions of one but do we really want to go the center east course? Do we really want another Gaddafi or Bashar amidst us? Democracy prevents wars from happening, promotes nThere are two kinds of reasons why India doesnt need a dictator strategic, and ethical. First strategic.Against-In a democr atic country like India, divided into various layers and clusters based on caste, religion, gender, region, ethnic and other basis, democracy is a great leveler because of two reasons all(prenominal) persons value is one (as a vote) and secondly, about(prenominal) people feel that they cook a stake in this system, particularly those who vote, and we keep up very last voting percentages across the world for democratic nations for our elections, particularThe only thing is whether they will justify it or like Thackeray, proudly say they did the wrong thing and ask others to challenge it if they dare to.When Indian people feel they fetch no stake in a system (they really wint mother a stake, because there is no MLA or MP they can go to in case the bureaucracy strikes at their rights), they will take to protest. A dictator will not allow non-violent protests most certainly, so they will take to violent protests someday. That will only mean violence and secession. Indias experie nce shows us that it is extension of democracy which solves our problems, be it in Mizoram or to an extent now in Assam, not dictatorship or army rule as seen in Kashmir.If India had a dictatorship earlier during the cartridge clip of independence, states like Tamil Nadu and Assam as well as North-East would have done all to secede somehow. Thankfully, because democracy was there and Nehru believedstrongly in it, we accommodated regional aspirations and that is why those issues were solved. And our issues can only be resolved in this way.Now ethical.I agree that a dictator can take decisions quickly, and democracy is always untidy, not just in India but in general anywhere. But development is nothing without equity, because development is for whom? Human beings. And it should be for all. Those who have no stake in much(prenominal)(prenominal) development will engage in violence sooner or later.ly at local and provincial levels.Once you introduce dictatorship, lets face it, the dictator will have a certain identity operator and do things as he/she likes. Indira Gandhi is a good example. Its good in theory to think of benignant dictators, but no dictator has ever been benign in the world, and no one can take on that someone will be a benign dictator.Even Manmohan Singh, the most soft-spoken of Indian politicians will not be a benign dictator, forget anyone else. Dictators will relish the index finger they have and soon use it to do wrongon aggression and freedom of expression. A country like India needs a democratic government which can work together as a unit to unite people around them which would in bring to help the country to develop. And its their right to have much(prenominal) stake, each humans right. So democracy will be messy when it takes into consideration every humans right in each and every development issue.But that equity in taking decisions is as much important as the decision itself. That is democracy. We have to accept it. It cant b e one man show or one party show. It has to be every person engaged in the decision. For-A resounding yesAs a common man i am ashamed to the stinking, shamelessly twisted ,grossly illogical and unimaginable twisting of democracy has taken this nation to. so called leaders who are better come to cleaning ditches are rolling on the dirt of corruption, greed and power with their deaths no where in sightOk lets VOTE for change sinfulness no Its voting for ONE dirty excuse of a human being or the Other filthy Bt-rdFools (no fools are decent) slaphappy excuse for the word fool who are barely biologically human & who cant even manage themselves are trying to manage(make it mismanage and loot) ministries and statesWhat India needs a strong and well minded dictator (No Idi-amins) who will redo the nation execute/exile for ever(a hidden secret Guantanamo bay) the corrupted-septic-infected politicians ranging from Kerala to Kashmir and rule wisely till India matures to be democracy or till no posterity of filthy politicians remain.What will it take to overcome India of its worst-in-the-world-corruption , its antique and grossly in legal government ,judiciary & worst of all politicians who still ravage the nation.Any such movement i am ready to participate as a true patriot to the nation.I CARE but i dont know how i can make a difference.we need a revolution and strong dictator (No maoists please)..Will there be a way ..is there a leader who we can support one among the clean poiticians who will have the gutshelp us plsIts a scream for help from a helpless citizen.looking for a way to liberate his fellow Indians from the satanical clutch India is in.help ushelp us help us patriots waiting to serve the nation For-Its been to a greater extent than sixty-five years since India achieved independence. The effort, toil, blood and passion of our respected freedom fighters gave us the India of today. It was their ultimate dream to craft a nation whose members were free and a n inherent part of the countrys decision making. The Indian democracy with its much detailed Constitution was a result of their dream. Sixty-five years on, India major power be free and those running the nation might be the elected representatives of the masses, but India continues to be plagued by the same old problems of poverty, economic inequality,illiteracy, population, general corruption and the same old socio-economic issues. It is perhaps the cartridge holder of an able, strong-minded, coercive dictator to take hold of the country and cleanse the entire system. Here is a look at 10 reasons why this might prove effective for the country- Dictatorship will breed development though truthful decision makingA dictator being the all powerful head of the state will face no resistor from other parties as in a democracy. He will thus have complete freedom to execute his decisions which might breed development. Better lock the variables of human development One of the bigges t examples is China (a Communist country) where the population has been brought under control by the government, through the one-child norm policy which is virtually unimaginable in the Indian democracy. Dictatorship is a more economic sanctuary In a country like India where poverty is a delaying problem, it is but a luxury to spend lakhs on a undivided election. Dictatorship is thus a far more economic institution. Dictatorships regimes can be a path for countries to move on from civil wars and cogitate on developmentChina can be used as an example yet again, as the country has been almost absolutely insulated from wars and terrorist attacks. Dictatorships have flexibility in economic policy that breeds growth Democracy can often stagnate economic development. An example is West Bengal where the Tata group could not establish their factory in Singur due to stiff resistance from the opposition party in the government. Dictatorship helps achieve social stability Yes it does. The eternal lasting and biggest economic miracles have occurred under dictatorships An example is Hitlers command in Germany. The Nazis came to power in Germany in 1933, at a time when its economy was in total collapse, with ruinous war-reparation obligations and zero prospects for foreign investing or credit.Yet through an independent monetary policy of monarch butterfly credit and a full-employment public-works program, the Third Reich was able to turn a deflower Germany, stripped of overseas colonies it could exploit, into the strongest economy in Europe within tetrad years, even before armament spending began. Dictatorship breeds order In a country like India where law and order is disrupted time and again, dictatorship is definitely going to help out.Even in the twenty-first century Indian women are vulnerable and rape and molestation cases are reported throughout the country from upscale Delhi to the remotevillages of Burdwan. India needs a really strong leader who ca n make the country dear enough for our women to move around fearlessly, with their heads held high. Dictators have incentives to promote development and precipitate social differences A lot of readers might still be positive enough to feel that democracy will spell better days for India, but as a youth frustrated with the current space of my country I feel that we really need a change and dictatorship may just be the way out for a better, brighter India.