Essay on Sartre’s “Man Is Condemned to Be Free” Essay

When Sartre writes that man is condemned to be free, he is elaborating on the statement man is liable for everything he does. Provided that immortal does not exist, man must live his condemned life of freedom without any values or commands that could legitimize his behavior.Furthermore, man has no style of justification or cause man has no excuse for his actions, because he has chosen them on his proclaim, out of his own freedom. Although freedom is traditionally characteristic of good, Sartre describes it most as a burden, because of his belief that God does not exist. When man discovers that he is without excuse, he has come to realize that he cannot find anything to depend on for without God, everything is permitted.Also, because on that point is no outside force driving every man, each man as an individual is responsible for shaping the image of man, or inventing man. Assuming that God in the heavens is not laying out the afterlife and that we are all responsible for ourse lves, at every instant man is condemned to invent man, for in that location is no definition of man except what we make it pg. 380, textbook.Furthermore, Sartre explains how each man creates his own morality. Because every man is free to do what they want and make their own decisions, they sometimes are put in a situation where they must choose between two different modes of action pg. 381, textbook. If God existed and made the future as he wanted it, man would not have to make these decisions. In choosing between these two paths, man must create what he unfeignedly believes in. This is choosing morality.In choosing, man develops his own morals and beliefs which result in his individual path of principles. Obviously, in some situations you may have chosen differently than another(prenominal) person, proving that something that means a lot to one person may in turn mean nothing to you.